In the world of audio receivers, Yamaha has consistently delivered products that meet the needs of home theater enthusiasts and audiophiles alike. The Yamaha RXV663 vs RXA870 are two prominent models from their product range, each offering unique features tailored for different user preferences. But how do these two receivers compare when it comes to performance, features, and value for money? This article will delve into a detailed comparison of the RXV663 vs RXA870 to help you make an informed decision based on your needs.
Introduction to Yamaha RXV663 vs RXA870
Before diving into the specifics, it’s important to understand the context and target audiences for both the RXV663 vs RXA870. These two receivers belong to Yamaha’s celebrated AVENTAGE and RX-V series, each catering to a different segment of audio enthusiasts.
- Yamaha RXV663: Released as part of Yamaha’s RX-V series, the RXV663 is designed for those who want an affordable and feature-rich AV receiver. With support for 7.1 channels, various audio formats, and a variety of connectivity options, it strikes a balance between performance and value.
- Yamaha RXA870: On the other hand, the RXA870 belongs to the AVENTAGE series, Yamaha’s higher-end line of receivers. This model focuses on superior build quality, enhanced sound performance, and advanced features like Dolby Atmos and DTS:X support. It’s designed for audiophiles who demand premium sound and top-tier performance.
Key Differences Between RXV663 vs RXA870
1. Build Quality and Design RXV663 vs RXA870
When it comes to build quality, the RXA870 takes the lead. Yamaha’s AVENTAGE series is known for its superior construction, and the RXA870 is no exception. Here are some key aspects of the build:
- RXA870: The RXA870 is built with an aluminum front panel that offers a more refined look and a durable, premium feel. It also includes a symmetrical power amp layout for reduced crosstalk, enhancing sound clarity and separation.
- RXV663: The RXV663, while solidly built, uses a more standard plastic chassis. Though not as premium in appearance or feel as the RXA870, it still offers good durability for its price point.
2. Audio Performance RXV663 vs RXA870
When it comes to audio performance, the RXA870 excels, offering a wider array of advanced features and sound enhancement technologies compared to the RXV663.
- RXA870: The RXA870 supports Yamaha’s exclusive YPAO (Yamaha Parametric Room Acoustic Optimizer) system, which automatically calibrates the speaker settings to your room’s acoustics for optimal sound. Additionally, it has more powerful amplification (closer to 120 watts per channel), providing rich, immersive sound for demanding home theater setups.
- RXV663: While the RXV663 offers decent sound quality for its price, it lacks the advanced room correction system like YPAO found in the RXA870. It does feature standard auto calibration but doesn’t offer the same level of customization. The amplification here is more modest, with around 90 watts per channel, which may be sufficient for casual listeners but lacks the refinement of the RXA870.
3. Connectivity and Features RXV663 vs RXA870
Both the RXV663 vs RXA870 provide a wide range of connectivity options, but there are notable differences in terms of advanced features and modern compatibility.
- RXA870: This receiver is equipped with HDMI 2.1 ports, which support 4K/120Hz and 8K video, as well as support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X audio formats. The RXA870 also features Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, AirPlay, and Spotify Connect, offering robust wireless connectivity options for modern streaming and multi-room setups.
- RXV663: The RXV663, on the other hand, has HDMI 1.3 inputs, which means it doesn’t support the latest video formats like 4K at 120Hz or 8K. It does include several HDMI ports, but without the next-gen compatibility found in the RXA870. Wireless features like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth are also not available, limiting its appeal to users who require seamless wireless streaming.
4. Surround Sound Technology RXV663 vs RXA870
- RXA870: One of the standout features of the RXA870 is its support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X. These technologies allow for immersive 3D sound, making you feel as though sound is coming from all around you, including from above. This makes the RXA870 ideal for users who want a truly cinematic experience.
- RXV663: While the RXV663 supports standard surround sound formats such as Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio, it lacks support for Dolby Atmos and DTS:X. It provides a more basic surround sound experience that’s sufficient for casual listeners but not ideal for those who want the latest immersive sound technologies.
5. Power and Amplification RXV663 vs RXA870
- RXA870: The RXA870 features a more powerful amplifier, capable of delivering 120 watts per channel. This extra power allows it to drive larger speakers with ease, delivering clean and dynamic sound even at higher volumes. The symmetrical layout of the amp reduces distortion and enhances sound clarity, making it perfect for audiophiles.
- RXV663: With a power output of 90 watts per channel, the RXV663 is better suited for smaller to medium-sized rooms and home theater setups. While it still provides enough power for most users, it may struggle to drive larger, high-performance speakers without losing some audio detail.
6. User Interface and Setup RXV663 vs RXA870
- RXA870: The setup process for the RXA870 is relatively straightforward, thanks to the YPAO calibration system, which automatically optimizes your audio setup for the room. It also has an intuitive graphical user interface, which makes navigating settings and modes a breeze.
- RXV663: The RXV663 offers a more traditional setup with a basic on-screen menu, and it lacks the advanced features of the RXA870’s YPAO. However, it is still fairly easy to set up, and it offers basic speaker calibration through Yamaha’s Auto Calibration feature.
Pros and Cons of RXV663
Pros:
- Affordable: The RXV663 provides great value for its price, offering solid performance at a budget-friendly cost.
- User-friendly: Easy to set up and use, making it a good choice for those new to AV receivers.
- Decent Sound: Offers good audio quality with support for most standard surround sound formats.
Cons:
- Limited Connectivity: Lacks HDMI 2.1 support and advanced wireless features.
- Lower Power Output: May not be able to drive larger or high-end speakers effectively.
- No Dolby Atmos or DTS:X: Not suitable for users looking for the latest immersive audio formats.
Pros and Cons of RXA870
Pros:
- Premium Build Quality: High-quality materials and construction that ensure durability and improved sound.
- Advanced Sound Features: Supports Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, and YPAO for superior sound performance.
- Future-Proof: Equipped with HDMI 2.1, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth for compatibility with the latest audio and video technologies.
Cons:
- Price: The RXA870 is more expensive than the RXV663, making it a larger investment.
- Complexity: With its many advanced features, it may be overkill for those seeking a simple receiver for casual use.
Which One Should You Choose RXV663 vs RXA870?
The decision between the RXV663 vs RXA870 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget.
- If you’re a casual listener or on a budget, the RXV663 offers excellent value for money. It’s perfect for someone looking for a reliable, straightforward AV receiver that provides decent sound quality without breaking the bank.
- If you’re an audiophile or home theater enthusiast who demands the best in sound quality, advanced features like Dolby Atmos, and future-proof compatibility, the RXA870 is the clear winner. It may come with a higher price tag, but the performance improvements and premium build justify the investment for those who truly care about their home audio experience.
Conclusion
In the battle between the RXV663 vs RXA870, it’s clear that the RXA870 is a more advanced and feature-packed receiver, offering superior audio quality, modern connectivity, and support for the latest immersive audio technologies. However, the RXV663 still holds its ground as an excellent option for users who want great value at a lower price point.
Ultimately, your choice should depend on your budget, sound quality expectations, and future-proofing needs. Both models offer excellent performance within their respective price ranges, and either one will provide a great audio experience depending on what you’re looking for.
