Asset management is an important function for businesses functioning in different industries. Right from tracking inventory to keeping an eye on tools and equipment, organizations need the right system. To track physical assets, traditionally barcode asset tags were used. However, with technological advancement, QR Code asset tags are taking over.
You might think that QR Code asset tags might cost you more than traditional barcode tags. But the former can be more beneficial than the latter in many ways. They are more versatile. Here is a comparison of both so that you can arrive at an informed decision.
Data Storage Capacity
- One of the important advantages of QR codes over bar codes is better data storage capacity.
- Traditional UPC or Code 39 formats can store only limited data
- Traditional bar codes can store only 20-30 characters
- You can store only asset identification numbers on traditional barcodes.
- There should be a separate database for traditional barcodes
- QR Code asset tags can store more information as they are two-dimensional
- It is possible to store nearly 4000 alpha-numeric characters on a QR Code
- So, directly on the tag, a lot of asset-specific information can be stored.
- The need for an external database is eliminated with QR Code Asset Tags
- Businesses can store essential details like maintenance history, warranty information, and serial numbers in QR Codes.
- It is also possible to link to an external database if more information about an asset is required
The ability to store more information straight on the tag makes QR Code asset tags more efficient and versatile. So, your business can access asset information even from an offline atmosphere.
Easy Scanning
Traditionally barcodes need precise alignment with a barcode scanner. Only then, the information stored can be read correctly. In case, there is dirt, scratch, or damage to the barcode, it may not scan at all. As a result, there can be a delay in asset tracking. Moreover, barcode scanners should be close to the code to properly read it.
On the other hand, QR Code asset tags are easier to scan. As QR Codes are two-dimensional, they can be scanned from any angle. So, they offer greater flexibility in how they are attached to the assets. Above all, QR Codes are resilient to partial damage. Even if a small portion of the code is damaged, still, the code can be scanned.
Moreover, you need not have any special scanner for QR Codes. You can use your tablet or smartphone to access the details stored. So, your business need not have to invest in barcode scanners. Employees can use their smartphones to scan QR codes. So, asset tracking becomes more efficient.
Conclusion
Apart from these benefits, the multifunctional nature of QR Codes along with easy deployment and cost-effectiveness make them beneficial compared to traditional bar codes. Moreover, they carry enhanced security features, thereby making them better than traditional bar codes.
